MIAMI, FL – Researchers at the University of Miami School of Medicine compared the outcomes of cirrhotic patients who underwent liver transplants for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis versus alcoholic liver disease and found no statistically significant differences in post-transplant survival rates between the nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and alcoholic liver disease groups. Study findings are presented in a recent issue of Liver Transplantation, a journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

According to the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis affects 2%-5% of Americans and ranks as one of the major causes of cirrhosis in the U.S. behind hepatitis C and alcoholic liver disease. Incidences of both nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease are increasing, possibly because of the greater number of Americans with obesity. Obesity also contributes to diabetes and high blood cholesterol, which can further complicate the health of someone with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Because it is often a “silent” liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis can lead to cirrhosis and permanent damage. Once serious scarring or cirrhosis is present, few treatments can halt the progression. Liver transplantation remains the only treatment for advanced cirrhosis with liver failure and is increasingly performed in people with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

Vishal Bhagat, M.D, and colleagues demonstrated that liver transplant is an appropriate treatment for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients, with survival rates comparable to those for alcoholic liver disease patients. The team performed a retrospective chart review on all patients who underwent liver transplant for cryptogenic cirrhosis with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis phenotype and alcoholic cirrhosis at the University of Miami from January 1997 through January 2007.

Cryptogenic cirrhosis was defined by absence of significant alcohol use (>20 gm/day), negative tests for viral hepatitis, negative autoimmune markers such as anti-nuclear antibody and anti-mitochondrial antibody, and negative markers for hemochromatosis, Wilson disease and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency.

The alcoholic cirrhosis group included patients who had history of significant alcohol, had no biochemical, serological and histological evidence of other known causes of cirrhosis, and underwent liver transplant from January 1997 through January 2007. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and alcoholic cirrhosis with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis phenotype were excluded from the alcoholic cirrhosis group.

Baseline data on alcohol use, BMI, blood pressure and fasting serum levels of glucose, total cholesterol and triglycerides was recorded for both groups prior to liver transplant and after 6 months post-liver transplant. Demographic information was also collected including: recipient age, recipient sex, recipient ethnicity, donor age, cold ischemia time, biopsy proven acute and/or chronic rejection, biopsy proven recurrence of moderate to severe steatohepatitis in the transplanted liver, causes of retransplantation, graft survival, causes of death and patient survival.

“Our study presents the largest patient population with the longest follow-up published so far on the survival of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis,” said Dr. Bhagat. “We found that although there was a trend towards lower patient survival in the nonalcoholic steatohepatitis group compared with the alcoholic cirrhosis group, the difference was not statistically significant.”

In both the nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and alcoholic cirrhosis groups, sepsis (with or without multisystem organ failure) was the most common cause of death post-liver transplant, which is consistent with previously published data, followed by cardiovascular causes in the nonalcoholic steatohepatitis group and malignancies in the alcoholic cirrhosis group. Although higher number of patients died from cardiovascular causes in the nonalcoholic steatohepatitis group (26%) compared with the alcoholic cirrhosis group (7%), the difference did not reach statistical significance. “Cardiovascular mortality among nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients was much higher than published autopsy results in liver transplant patients and stresses the importance of control of the metabolic syndrome post-transplant in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients,” added Dr. Bhagat.

In a related study also published in Liver Transplantation, researchers at the Cleveland Clinic lead by Arthur McCullough, M.D., found that the development of metabolic syndrome following liver transplantation is on the rise and is a significant contributor to cardiovascular complications and morbidity and mortality. “Cardiovascular mortality and higher infection rates among patients with post-transplant metabolic syndrome remains a concern,” said Dr. McCullough. “There is clearly a need for prospective studies to help identify and validate risk factors for post-transplant metabolic syndrome and thereby develop interventional strategies.”

- MFP Wire Services
- 11-28-2009